Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Bibliography

  • [1] TierSchNutztV (2006): Animal Welfare and Livestock Husbandry Ordinance, as published on 22 August 2006 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2043), last amended by Article 1a of the Ordinance of 29 January 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 146).
  • [2] Andersen, I.L. & Ocepek, M. (2021): Why should we worry about farrowing systems for sows: insights from studies on maternal behaviour? Freedom in Farrowing and Lactation 2021 (FFL21) Virtual Workshop: Overcoming barriers, facilitating change. 12–13 August 2021. www.freefarrowing.org
  • [3] Marchant, J.N., Rudd, A.R., Mendl, M.T., Broom, D.M., Meredith, M.J., Corning, S. & Simmins, P.H. (2000): Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Veterinary Record, 147(8), 209–214.
  • [4] Alonso-Spilsbury, M., Ramirez-Necoechea, R., Gonzlez-Lozano, M., Mota-Rojas, D. & Trujillo-Ortega, M. E. (2007): Piglet survival in early lactation: a review. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances.
  • [5] Geiping, L. & Große Beilage, E. (2020): Mortality in neonatal suckling piglets – a literature review on prevalence and risk factors. Der praktische Tierarzt, 101(3), 280-291.
  • [6] Feller, B., Franke, G., Bauer, T., Böhmfeld, J., Formowitz, B., Fritzsche, S., Grimm, E., Häuser, S., Jais, C., Janssen, H., Lösel, D., Meyer, C., Meyer, E., Meyer-Hamme, S., Neser, S., Paulke, T., Peperkorn, K., Preißinger, W., Sandhäger, A., Scholz, A., Schrade, H., Weber, M. & Zacharias, T. (2021): Comprehensive Farm Management Concept for Pigs – Sows and Piglets, Federal Agency for Agriculture and Food, Bonn.
  • [7] Heidinger, B., Maschat, K., Kuchling, S., Hochfellner, L., Winckler, C., Baumgartner, J. & Leeb, C. (2022): Short confinement of sows after farrowing, but not pen type, affects live-born piglet mortality. Animal, 16(2), 100446.
  • [8] Weber, R., Keil, N.M., Fehr, M. & Horat, R. (2007): Piglet mortality on farms using farrowing systems with or without crates. Animal Welfare, 16(2), 277-279.
  • [9] Schrader, L., Schubbert, A., Rauterberg, S., Czycholl, I., Leeb, C., Ziron, M., Krieter, J., Schultheiß, U. & Zapf, R. (2020a): Animal welfare indicators: Practical guide – pigs. Recommendations for the production sectors sows, suckling piglets, weaned piglets and fattening pigs. KTBL, Darmstadt, 2nd edition.
  • [10] Schrader, L., Schubbert, A., Rauterberg, S., Schultheiß, U. & Zapf, R. (2020b): Animal welfare indicators for sows and suckling piglets: Proposals for target and alarm values for on-farm self-monitoring, KTBL, Darmstadt. https://www.ktbl.de/themen/tierschutzindikatoren-sauen
  • [11] Große Beilage, E. (2020): Literature review on the housing of sows during pre-farrowing, farrowing and the lactation period. Foundation of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Branch Office for Epidemiology.
  • [12] Ocepek, M., Rosvold, E.M., Andersen-Ranberg, I. & Andersen, I.L. (2017): Can we improve maternal care in sows? Maternal behavioural traits important for piglet survival in loose-housed sow herds. Journal of Animal Science, 95(11), 4708-4717.
  • [13] Baxter, E.M., King, R.H., Bouwers, N., Balzani, A. & Edwards, S.A. (2018): Selecting the right sow – Where do we go from here? Loose Lactating Sows Workshop 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • [14] Patzkéwitsch, D., Erhard, M., Kickstein, J., Bergmann, S. & Klein, S. (2018): Field study on free farrowing in a cold barn, Veterinary Practice Issue G: Large Animals/Farm Animals 5/2018; 46: 298-306; DOI: 10.15653/TPG-180442.
  • [15] Schild, S.L.A., Baxter, E.M. & Pedersen, L.J. (2020): A review of neonatal mortality in outdoor organic production and possibilities to increase piglet survival. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 231, 105088.
  • [16] Obermaier, S., Sinz, E. & Helmreich, S. (2021): Selection of maternal and docile sows for in-house replacement. Edited by the Bavarian State Institute for Agriculture. Animal Production Coordination (IAB). Freising. Available online at https://www.lfl.bayern.de/muetterlichkeitsindex.
  • [17] Hellbrügge, B. & Henne, H. (2010): Integration of behavioural traits into pig breeding programmes. 8th Pig Workshop, Conference Proceedings, pp. 52–63, Uelzen, Germany.
  • [18] Appel, A. (2013): Genetic analysis of behavioural traits in pigs, PhD thesis, University of Göttingen.
  • [19] Sinz, E., Helmreich, S., Obermaier, S. & Knierim, U. (2020): Influence of behavioural traits and litter characteristics on successful piglet production in organic farming. Proceedings of the 2020 Organic Farming Conference.
  • [20] Früh, B. & Sinz, E. (2021): Natural rebreeding of sows on organic farms, Factsheet No. 1133, Ed.: FiBL, Bavarian State Institute for Agriculture (LfL).https://www.fibl.org/de/shop/1133-eigenremontierung-sauen
  • [21] Götz, M. (2019): Switzerland pursues a different breeding objective. Schweizer Bauer. https://www.schweizerbauer.ch/tiere/schweine/schweiz-verfolgt-anderes-zuchtziel/
  • [22] Anonymous (2020): Breeding trends in current sow lines, agrarheute, 01/2020, pp. 16–17. https://www.agrarheute.com/sites/agrarheute.com/files/2020-01/trends_in_der_sauenzucht.pdf
  • [23] Anonymous (2003): Breeding for teat quality? SUS, 6/2003, p. 53.
  • [24] Pfeiffer, C., Fuerst-Waltl, B., Schodl, K. & Knapp, P. (2019): Genetic Analysis of Feet and Leg Conformation and Proportion of Crushed Piglets in Austrian Large White and Landrace Sows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(5), 1213–1219.
  • [25] Rahnefeld, G.W. & Swierstra, E.E. (1970): Influence of the sire on litter size in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 50(3), 671–675.
  • [26] Roca, J., Broekhuijse, M L.W.J., Parrilla, I., Rodriguez‐Martinez, H., Martinez, E.A. & Bolarin, A. (2015): Boar differences in artificial insemination outcomes: can they be minimised? Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50, 48-55.
  • [27] Hamann, H., Steinheuer, R. & Distl, O. (2004): Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size as a sow and boar trait in German herdbook Landrace and Pietrain swine. Livestock Production Science, 85(2-3), 201-207.
  • [28] Wolf, J. & Wolfova, M. (2012): Effect of service sire on litter size traits in Czech Large White and Landrace pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57(57), 220–30.
  • [29] Pedersen, M.L.M., Velander, I.H., Nielsen, M.B.F., Lundeheim, N. & Nielsen, B. (2019): Duroc boars have lower progeny mortality and lower fertility than Pietrain boars. Translational Animal Science, 3(2), 885-892.
  • [30] Hoy, S., Wähner, M., Kleine Klausing, H., Petzold, M. & Hellweg, E.G. (2009): Handbook of Gilt Management. The ‘Princesses’ of the Farm. Breeding, Housing, Feeding and Animal Health. 1st edition. Agricultural and Veterinary Academy (AVA).
  • [31] Meyer, E. & Müller, K. (2006): Optimal farrowing pens – More piglets reared. SUS 1/2006, 32–37.
  • [32] Marchant, J. & Broom, D. (1996): Factors affecting posture-changing in loose-housed and confined gestating sows. Animal Science, 63(3), 477–485. DOI:10.1017/S135772980001537X
  • [33] Kleine Klausing, H., Schäfer, K. & Lenz, H. (1998): Breeding condition: Fit, but not fat! top agrar 12: 4-7.
  • [34] Rechenmeister (2022): Rechenmeister for more efficient pig feeding, North Rhine-Westphalia Chamber of Agriculture. https://www.oekolandbau.nrw.de/fachinfo/tierhaltung/schweine/neuauflage-rechenmeister-fuer-eine-effizientere-schweinefuetterung
  • [35] DLG (2021a): Feeding and Animal Welfare in Pigs – Part A: Feed, Feeding and Fibre Supply. DLG Fact Sheet 463, German Agricultural Society, Frankfurt am Main.
  • [36] DLG e.V. – Working Group on Feed and Feeding (ed.) (2008): Recommendations for sow and piglet feeding, Practical guide to requirements and feeding strategies. DLG Information 1/2008. DLG-Verlags GmbH, Frankfurt am Main.
  • [37] DLG (2021b): Feeding and Animal Welfare in Pigs – Part B: Water Supply and Feed Hygiene. DLG Fact Sheet 464, German Agricultural Society, Frankfurt am Main.
  • [38] Mayer, J.J., Martin, F.D. & Brisbin Jr, I.L. (2002): Characteristics of wild pig farrowing nests and beds in the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78(1), 1-17.
  • [39] Jarvis, S., Calvert, S.K., Stevenson, J. & Lawrence, A.B. (2002): Pituitary-adrenal activation in pre-parturient pigs (Sus scrofa) is associated with behavioural restriction due to lack of space rather than nesting substrate. Animal Welfare, 11(4), 371–384.
  • [40] Jarvis, S., Reed, B.T., Lawrence, A.B., Calvert, S.K. & Stevenson, J. (2004): Peri-natal environmental effects on maternal behaviour, pituitary and adrenal activation, and the progress of parturition in the primiparous sow. Animal Welfare, 13(2), 171–181.
  • [41] Wischner, D., Kemper, N. & Krieter, J. (2009a): Nest-building behaviour in sows and consequences for pig husbandry. Livestock Science, 124: 1-8.
  • [42] Andersen, I.L., Berg, S. & Bøe, K.E. (2005): Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa) – purely accidental or a poor mother? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 229–243.
  • [43] Pedersen, L.J., Jorgensen, E., Heiskanen, T. & Damm, B.I. (2006): Early piglet mortality in loose-housed sows related to sow and piglet behaviour and to the progress of parturition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96: 215-232.
  • [44] Wischner, D., Kemper, N., Stamer, E., Hellbruegge, B., Presuhn, U. & Krieter, J. (2009b): Characterisation of sows’ postures and posture changes with regard to crushing piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119: 49-55.
  • [45] Hansen, C.F., Hales, J., Weber, P.M., Edwards, S.A. & Moustsen, V.A. (2017): Confinement of sows 24 h before expected farrowing affects the performance of nest-building behaviours but not the progress of parturition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 188, 1-8.
  • [46] Pedersen, L.J., Malmkvist, J. & Andersen, H. (2013): Housing of sows during farrowing: A review on pen design, welfare and productivity. Livestock Housing: Modern Management to Ensure Optimal Health and Welfare of Farm Animals, 93–111. 10.3920/978-90-8686-771-4_05.
  • [47] Kamphues, B. (2004): Comparison of housing systems for the individual housing of lactating sows, with particular regard to the effects on animal behaviour and economic efficiency. Georg-August University of Göttingen, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, PhD thesis.
  • [48] Meyer, E. & Jähnig, M. 2012: Lying behaviour of sows in crates. Der fortschrittliche Landwirt, Issue 16, p. 20.
  • [49] Baumgartner, J., Winckler, C., Quendler, E., Ofner, E., Zentner, E., Dolezal, M., Schmoll, F., Schwarz, C., Koller, M., Winkler, U., Laister, S., Fröhlich, M., Podiwinsky, C., Martetschläger, R., Schleicher, W., Ladinig, A., Rudorfer, B., Huber, G., Mösenbacher, I. & Troxler, J. (2009): Assessment of mass-produced farrowing pens with regard to animal behaviour, health and biological performance, as well as in terms of labour requirements and legal compliance, Final report on research project No. 1437 BMGFJ BMLFUW, GZ. LE.1.3.2/0003-II/1/2005, Vienna.
  • [50] Marchant, J.N., Broom, D.M. & Corning, S. (2001): The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Animal Science, 72: 19–28.
  • [51] Damm, B.I., Forkman, B. & Pedersen, L.J. (2005): Lying down and rolling behaviour in sows in relation to piglet crushing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90(1), 3-20.
  • [52] Bolhuis, J.E., Raats-Van den Boogaard, A.M.E., Hoofs, A.I.J. & Soede, N.M. (2018): Effects of loose housing and the provision of alternative nesting material on peri-partum sow behaviour and piglet survival. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 202, 28–33.
  • [53] Danholt, L., Moustsen, V.A., Nielsen, M.B.F. & Kristensen, A.R. (2011): Rolling behaviour of sows in relation to piglet crushing on sloped versus level floor pens. Livestock Science, 141(1), 59–68.
  • [54] Weary, D.M., Phillips, P.A., Pajor, E.A., Fraser, D. & Thompson, B. K. (1998): Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 61(2), 103–111.
  • [55] Gu, Z., Gao, Y., Lin, B., Zhong, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, C. & Li, B. (2011): Impacts of a freedom farrowing pen design on sow behaviours and performance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 102(4), 296–303.
  • [56] Janczak, A.M., Pedersen, L.J., Rydhmer, L. & Bakken, M. (2003): Relationship between early fear- and anxiety-related behaviour and maternal ability in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 82 (2), 121–135. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00055-8.
  • [57] Lensink, B.J., Leruste, H., Le Roux, T. & Bizeray-Filoche, D. (2009a): Relationship between the behaviour of sows at 6 months old and the behaviour and performance at farrowing. Animal, 3 (1), 128–134. DOI: 10.1017/s1751731108003261.
  • [58] Lensink, B.J., Leruste, H., Bretagne, T. de & Bizeray-Filoche, D. (2009b): Sow behaviour towards humans during standard management procedures and their relationship to piglet survival. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119 (3-4), 151-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.04.007.
  • [59] Waiblinger, S., Menke, C. & Coleman, G. (2002): The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79 (3), 195-219. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00155-7.
  • [60] Hemsworth, P.H. (2007): Ethical stockmanship. Australian Veterinary Journal 85 (5), 194–200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00112.x.
  • [61] Moustsen, V.A., Johanson, K.P., Forkman, B., Nielsen, M.B.F. & Andrease, S. N. (2016): Impact of playing classical music and scratching on avoidance distance in loose-housed farrowing sows. Proceedings of the 50th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, (Vol. 1, p276).
  • [62] De Meyer, D., Amalraj, A., Van Limbergen, T., Fockedey, M., Edwards, S., Moustsen, V.A., Chantziaras, I. & Maes, D. (2020): Effect of positive handling of sows on litter performance and pre-weaning piglet mortality. Animal, 14(8), 1733-1739.
  • [63] Johnson, A.K., Morrow, J.L., Dailey, J.W. & McGlone, J.J. (2007): Pre-weaning mortality in loose-housed lactating sows: Behavioural and performance differences between sows who crush or do not crush piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 105(1-3), 59-74.
  • [64] Schneider, F. (2017): Analysis of piglet losses in the exercise pens of the LfL project. Bavarian State Institute for Agriculture, Exercise pens in piglet production.
  • [65] Deter, A. (2017): Sow showering: Simply getting them wet is not enough. https://www.topagrar.com/schwein/news/sauenduschen-nass-machen-allein-reicht-nicht-9532282.html
  • [66] Thodberg, K., Jensen, K.H., Herskin, M.S. & Jorgensen, E. (1999): Influence of environmental stimuli on nest building and farrowing behaviour in domestic sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 63: 131-144.
  • [67] Damm, B.I., Heiskanen, T., Pedersen, L.J., Jørgensen, E. & Forkman, B. (2010): Sow preferences for farrowing under a cover with and without access to straw. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 126(3-4), 97-104.
  • [68] Rosvold, E.M., Newberry, R.C., Framstad, T. & Andersen, I.L. (2018): Nest-building behaviour and activity budgets of sows provided with different materials. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 200, 36-44.
  • [69] Rosvold, E.M., Newberry, R.C. & Andersen, I.L. (2019): Early mother-young interactions in domestic sows – Nest-building material increases maternal investment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 219: 104837. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104837.
  • [70] Anonymous (2019): Duration of birth: it becomes dangerous after 300 minutes. https://www.topagrar.com/schwein/news/geburtsdauer-ab-300-minuten-wird-es-gefaehrlich-9842129.html
  • [71] Mayer, C., Hillmann, E. & Schrader, L. (2006): Behaviour, housing, evaluation of housing systems. In: Brade, W. & Flachowsky, G. (eds.): Pig Breeding and Pig Meat Production – Recommendations for Practice, Special Issue 296, pp. 94–122, Federal Research Centre for Agriculture, Braunschweig.
  • [72] Bünger, B. (1984): Early postnatal piglet behaviour as a vitality criterion. PhD thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Humboldt University, Berlin.
  • [73] Meyer, E. (2014): Investigations into the birth management of suckling piglets taking birth weight into account, https://docplayer.org/19133801-Untersuchungen-zum-geburtsmanagement-von-saugferkeln-unter-beruecksichtigung-des-geburtsgewichtes.html
  • [74] McBride, G. (1963): The "teat order" and communication in young pigs. Animal Behaviour, 11(1), 53–56.
  • [75] Whittemore, C.T. & Fraser, D. (1974): The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. II. Vocalisation of the sow in relation to suckling behaviour and milk ejection. British Veterinary Journal, 130(4), 346–356.
  • [76] Ellendorf, F., Forsling, M.L. & Poulain, D.A. (1982): The milk ejection reflex in the pig. The Journal of Physiology, 333(1), 577–594.
  • [77] Meyer, E. & Vergara, H. (2019): Investigations into iron supply in suckling piglets, https://www.landwirtschaft.sachsen.de/download/Meyer_Eisen_Fachinfo.pdf.
  • [78] Meyer, E., Vogel, M. & Wähner, A. (2012): Investigations on acceptance and appropriate size of piglet nests, Landtechnik 67(5):362-365.
  • [79] Moustsen, V.A., Hales, J., Lahrmann, H.P., Weber, P.M. & Hansen, C.F. (2013): Confinement of lactating sows in crates for 4 days after farrowing reduces piglet mortality. Animal: an international journal of animal bioscience, 7, 648-654.
  • [80] Chidgey, K.L., Morel, P.C.H., Stafford, K.J. & Barugh, I.W. (2015): Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand pig farm. Livestock Science 173, 87–94.
  • [81] Hales, J., Moustsen, V.A., Devreese, A.M., Nielsen, M.B.F. & Hansen, C.F. (2015a): Comparable farrowing progress in confined and loose-housed hyper-prolific sows. Livestock Science 171, 64–72.
  • [82] Hales, J., Moustsen, V.A., Nielsen, M.B. & Hansen, C.F. (2015b): Temporary confinement of loose-housed hyperprolific sows reduces piglet mortality. Journal of Animal Science, 93, 4079–4088.
  • [83] Lambertz, C., Petig, M., Elkmann, A. & Gauly, M. (2015): Confinement of sows for different periods during lactation: effects on behaviour and lesions of sows and performance of piglets. Animal, 9, 1373–1378.
  • [84] Heidinger, B., Stinglmayr, J., Maschat, K., Oberer, M., Blumauer, E., Kuchling, S., Leeb, C., Hatzmann, E., Zentner, E., Hochfellner, L., Laubichler, C., Dolezal, M., Schwarz, L., Mösenbacher-Molterer, I., Vockenhuber, D. & Baumgartner, J. (2017): Evaluation of new farrowing pens with exercise options for sows, Pro-SAU final report.
  • [85] King, R.L., Baxter, E.M., Matheson, S.M. & Edwards, S.A. (2019): Temporary crate opening procedure affects immediate post-opening piglet mortality and sow behaviour. Animal, 13(1), 189–197.