- Prof Dr. Axel Wehrend, Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University Giessen
- Prof Dr. Johannes Kauffold, Clinic for Cloven-hoofed Animals, University of Leipzig
- Peggy Käferle, Thüringer Landgesellschaft mbH
- Julia Maischak-Dyck, Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen
- Lukas Trzebiatowski, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Neonatology at Justus Liebig University Giessen
Introduction
Good monitoring of cows due to give birth is necessary in order to recognise birth disorders in good time and to ensure that the calf is initially supplied with colostrum and that the cow receives follow-up care. Technical aids for birth monitoring can reduce the need for the presence of staff or regular check-ups. The cows are not unnecessarily disturbed during this sensitive phase and the amount of labour required for monitoring is reduced.
Reliable notification of births with fewer disturbances in the calving area can have a positive effect on the course of the birth and the subsequent postpartum phase.
To achieve this, a system that is suitable for the farm and reliable notification of impending births by the aids without false alarms is desirable. With the systems currently available, a distinction can be made between systems that are specifically designed for use in animals for birth detection and those that send a birth report in addition to other parameters. Accordingly, the systems currently available on the market differ greatly in terms of their reliability for correctly detecting labour. A good sensor reliably reports the imminent birth without triggering false alarms. To classify the quality of a system, a distinction is made between sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity indicates how many of the births that have taken place have been correctly recognised. The specificity indicates how many of the cows that were not in labour were correctly detected and therefore no false alarms were triggered. A major difference lies in the time of the alarm and therefore the distance to the start of the expulsion phase. The closer the alarm is triggered to the time of birth, the higher the error rate. Exceptions to this are sensors that only emit a signal during the expulsion phase. The choice of the right sensor must therefore be made on a farm-specific basis.
Camera
The camera provides a direct view into the calving box. It provides a visual representation of the overall situation, which means that observation is still absolutely necessary. Internet-capable cameras enable transmission to mobile devices (mobile phones, laptops, etc.), allowing for spatial flexibility. The use of cameras can save a considerable amount of time, as there is no need to travel to the calving barn. Automatic alarm functions are not yet ready for practical use. Several cameras may be required to view the entire calving area. The camera system must be suitable for use under barn conditions (dust, moisture, etc.). The camera position and also the lighting conditions (infrared camera for hindsight if necessary) must be taken into account.
Birth indicator for use in the vagina
A sensor is inserted into the cow's vagina before the calculated calving date. The exact time varies according to the manufacturer's instructions and can range from around two weeks to a few days before birth. The sensor records either the temperature or the temperature and incidence of light. If the sensor emerges from the vagina during the birth process, the drop in temperature or the drop in temperature and the incidence of light are registered. This results in a notification. Depending on the manufacturer, there may be a high number of error messages, e.g. if the sensor falls out without the start of labour.
Birth detector tail root
The birth detector at the root of the tail reacts to the holding back of the tail. In the opening phase of birth and often in the days leading up to it, this also occurs independently of excretory behaviour. Due to strong animal-specific differences in behaviour, false positive reports can occur days before birth. Devices for this measurement can either be fixed to the root of the tail or attached to the base of the tail using a chest and belly harness. The correct application must be carefully checked and regularly monitored to ensure that there are no circulatory problems in the tail and that the devices do not fall off. A too tight fit can lead to the lower half of the tail dying off within a short time.
Rumen bolus
Depending on the manufacturer, a rumen bolus records various parameters such as activity, rumination, temperature or rumen pH. Among other things, the drop in body temperature that occurs around 24 hours before birth is used to monitor the birth. The bolus is administered to the cow with a bolus enema and then remains in the reticulum for life.
Movement activity
Movement activity can be recorded using pedometers, collars, ear tags or rumen boluses. Changes in walking and lying behaviour in the period close to birth trigger an alarm that can indicate the imminent birth. The advantage here lies in the easy handling and secure positioning of the sensors. However, measuring activity as an indicator of calving is less reliable than other systems.
Comparison of the different birth monitoring systems
| System | Handling | Effort for hygiene | Follow-up costs | Labour costs | Technical requirements |
| Camera |
|
|
|
|
|
| Birth detector vagina |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tail root birth detector |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rumen bolus |
|
|
|
|
|
| Movement activity |
|
|
|
|
|
| Chewing activity |
|
|
|
|
|
Literature
-
Immler, M. et al. Maternal Impact on Serum Immunoglobulin and Total Protein Concentration in Dairy Calves. Animals 2022, 12, 755.
-
Crociati, M. et al. How to Predict Parturition in Cattle? A Literature Review of Automatic Devices and Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Calving Prediction. Animals 2022, 12, 405.
-
Hoy, S. On the prediction of calving onset by measuring rumination duration. Pract. Veterinarian 96 (2015) pp. 164-172
-
Birth detector for cattle from Ireland tested at Haus Riswick (Landwirtschaftskammer NRW)